User blog comment:EmirK/About Kihara Amata's son and espers in Kihara family in general/@comment-128.12.95.107-20130712171745/@comment-184.145.202.239-20130808195057

^^Wow, someone is angry, lol.

Now time for your illusions to be broken.

There is a good chance the #6 is Aogami Pierce because Aihana Etsu describes his features perfectly.

Again, you really have no clue as to what 'leap in logic' means, do you? Let's examine your sentence again:

the #6 is Aogami Pierce because Aihana Etsu describes his features perfectly

First, whose features Etsu describe? The #6? How can you know, since we never saw him? It is stated that Etsu uses his acting abilities to impersonate the #6, not his looks. Now let's assume that by 'his features' you meant Aogami Pierce. Let's read the text in question:

This boy was wearing a black leather jacket

Oh. My. God. A leather jacket? I see the light! It really is Aogami!

...

Seriously?

Now this:

''This is a theory. This is speculation. I said I think. Do I have evidence? Heck no. But I think that's us getting trolled, but maybe not. You want proof? Fine. Here's some evidence. There's no proof. You can't prove anything the author hasn't explicitly written. This is writing not mathematics. You can have supportive arguments.''

Except you have no supportive arguments except what you want to see, straws you grasp at, and loose ends with no connection to each others that you attempt to link together so they support your fantasies.

You are certainly entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts.

But seriously, a theory has to have a basis in reality. You could say that the Mets are the greatest team ever (even though they have a losing record since they came into existence) if you could back it up by saying you were born in raised in Queens﻿ or that your father once pitched for them. But you can't have the theory that the '62 Mets were the greatest team ever (they set the record for most losses in a season). There is no basis in fact for that theory.

On the other hand, a speculation is a subjective view of something based on facts in evidence. Saying that Ben Franklin was the﻿ first man on the moon is not a speculation. Saying that the Chicago Cubs have won more Super Bowls than the Chicago Bears is not a speculation. Your claims are not speculations because they have no basis.

Since you are getting personal and calling my arguments retarded

And later

using the word retarded is a "no, no"; it is highly insensitive

Now I think there is a misunderstanding here. I said you just went full retard on us, which is a refference to the Internet meme You went full retard, never go full retard. It's not an insult per se, it simply means that you completely lost me. Hey, not my fault if you are not familiar with the Internet!

Now this:

Anyway, how else could a Kihara be influential if this Kihara did not have an esper power?

Oh, I don't know, money and intelligence maybe?

Look at influential people in real life.

''This Kihara talks to Yuiitsu as if Noukan could make those influential people easily go to her for more power, without her helping him to do so. This foreshadows the idea that he can do things on his own even though he is a golden retriever. OK. What does this mean? This means first of all that he is influential.''

Ok, nothing wrong for now, but later you will go on an entirely different tangent.

''Second of all. The kanji for his name is literally brainstem. Brainstem is an important functional part of the body that regulates important types of thought and is linked to high intelligence and I will clarify that it is located very near to the Hypothalamus a clear shout-out to Rensa even though the parts are clearly unrelated.''

Like you said yourself, the parts are clearly unrelated. You see the shout-out because you want to see it.

The external arithmetic circuits mentioned here that this Kihara has sound similar to the choker that Accelerator has.

By simple coincidence. I say that Laura Stuart looks like a grown up Index, does that mean she is her mother? While an interesting thought to entertain, it has simply no basis except my own eyes and interpretation of things.

''The Choker was an external arithmetic circuit that powered his ability through the Sisters network. Considering the fact that the Kiharas are aware of the Sisters network (clearly), they might be tapping into it in order to power Noukan. That is speculation. Otherwise, I note that having external arithmetic circuits makes him smarter than he would be anyway. He is a golden retriever with external arithmetic circuits that is smart.''

Keyword here is 'might'. It is indeed speculation, based on names and a function all brains possess.

So much for a supportive argument.

Anyway, I don't think there would be two people tapping into the MISAKA Network without an explicit mention by Kamachi.

''Kamachi surreptitiously dropped a hint earlier that animals cannot become espers only because they lack a high level of intelligence. He used a researcher/teacher to explain that animals like cats think on the same level as a 2 year old child.''

Primo, rather than a hint, it was info dump, do you think any info dump in the novels are hints of things to come? No.

''Now that we know that his mental age is far above that of a five year old child who should be able to start learning esper powers. Theoretically there is no reason that he couldn't learn esper powers.''

Have you considered the fact that a dog might not be able to project any kind of powers properly?

Noukan is clearly an esper because otherwise he would not be able to singlehandedly influence such influential people in the world otherwise (this is at least a reasonable assumption to make even if it isn't necessarily true).

Conclusion without basis, otherwise known as 'leap in logic'. Why wouldn't he be able to influence so much people without being an esper? Even your rationalization following this does not reduce the incoherence in what you just wrote.

Assuming this reasonable assumption is true, he has an esper power.

Except it is not reasonable, lol.

''He is obviously more capable than Nayumi. He is the most influential of the Kiharas. The other Kiharas are able to use level 5 powers or have used them. This makes me believe that this Kihara is most likely an esper user that is the #6.''

1.Well obviously

2.Yes

3.By copying them with technology, not on their own as espers. Know the distinction.

4.This makes me believe that it is most likely a fantasy.

This may be false 

It unfortunately is, sorry to break it down for you.

But there is certainly evidence and clear good logic here and some supporting evidence.

Evidence, no. Clear logic? You might want to re-assess that a little.

Anyway, I hope this helps answer some of your skepticism.

Frankly, no, rather it reinforces it.

I could give you a better argument, but I really don't care that much.

I would like it very much, thank you.

This is just a conjecture that 'would be nice to see because it is exciting to think about this possibility. '

See? Proof you only think this because you want it to be, not because it is based on reality.

''It would also explain the immunity of Kiharas. If one of them is the #6 (presumably their leader), then they would naturally have a lot of influence in the dark side of the city because it would be a way to get one of the level 5's to stay in line.''

You know their leader is Gensei, so try again. Anyway, I don't think they need a Level 5 in their ranks to have such influence, only intelligent people, and people able to counter the Level 5s.

Most importantly it would explain why the #6 is never seen: he is a golden retriever.

One of the only things that made sense in your whole comment. As much as I find your logic a bit...jumpy at times, I agree that would make sense.

Your other reasons for it? Not so much.

Hope that helps explain my retarded argument.

Nope. Not at all. But don't worry, it is not retarded, only full of holes, like Swiss cheese.

In conclusion, let me remind you one thing: Misaki recognized that someone was pretending to be the #6, meaning she met the #6, and at least knows he is a boy and is human, if not, her observation wouldn't make sense.

Your theory? Blown up to pieces.

Like I said, work on it.