Talk:Shinyaku Toaru Majutsu no Index Light Novel Volume 09/@comment-5215067-20131219183457/@comment-5230978-20131222123906

'Dude, it was a part of the sentence in the 1st post, how more clear can I get? If you didn't type those words yourself, how did you even come to the conclusion that it was adressed to you? Is it because I bolded it, so you thought it was a different post?'

Dude, that was a the quote of a sentence written in one of my posts, so you were actually replying to what I wrote not to what the other one did. Maybe you didn't noticed.

'my response to the OP was didvided in three parts: before I quoted Volume 6, followed by the word 'furthermore' to signal the continuation, and then 'finally' followed by the part quoted and my response to it. After that did I respond to your own post, and the tone was not only different, but it also didn't logically follow my 'Please tell me...'.'

The 4th reply, the one that you wanted to address to me, was added later. At the beginning there were two replies to what the other guy wrote and one to the quote of a sentence that I wrote, so your "And finnally" could be read as "And now the juicy part" or the like (because obviously thinking that the IT is scientifical is just nonsense) to introduce a reply directed to me, making it a post where you were apparently replying to two persons. I saw a lot of posts like this. And this is strenghten by the addition of the 4th reply. The fact that it wasn't related to the first topic and you used a different tone means nothing, because in one post you can respond to more than one topic, and you can use different tones even talking to the same person depending on what sentece/s you are reponding about.

So, no I have no comprehension problem, but you not only seems unable to properly quote and to find the right sources for quotes, you don't even know how a blog/forum post can be set. Before seeing the speck in the eye of the others, try to not fail seeing the beam of wood in your own.