Board Thread:Fun and Games/@comment-24516349-20140208174350/@comment-25431873-20140923182233

@OH&S: Yeah, you are right, my words went further than I intended to say, or rather, they followed a bit too closely to my actual thoughts and irrational anger, and should have been filtered. It's not my first argument, and I usually don't rile up as much. I will try to be calmer but, as you can see here and on my own wall, Mad Souler isn't making it any easier.

@Herald of Meridian: I will keep that in mind in the future, and I hope I didn't make too much of a bad first impression on one of the admins here in my first days as a registered wikia contributor.

@Mad Souler:

MAD SOULER wrote: ^&^^ It seems that even when I'm right ...

You stand against me. The way I see it, OH&S is only telling me to calm down as he knows me better (from another forum), and knows I usually don't act like that. Notice that he said nothing about you.

First: I was talking about power and how hard work can affect it. Which, again, you didn't make clear in your first post.

Second: I explained myself in the end on purpose because I wanted to see If you actually read my entire comment before jumping in. Er, no, you don't get to play 'I actually set up a trap for you!' instead of defusing the situation like any rational person would do. You don't know anything about me, so you had no idea if I would actually be reasonnable and retract my statements had you explained yourself, which I would have done. I read your post, and because you first post wasn't clear to me, I replied to it, you can't accuse me of not reading for a genuine mistake I'm sure others could have made, especially with your clunky English and syntax.

I can assume part of the blame, but so can you.

What you did right there, it's outright flamebaiting, by leading me into error and intentionnally riling me up. This is not an acceptable debate tactic, and on some forums it gets you infractions. You are not Socrates, you are not Schopenhauer, you have nothing of a good rhetorician: you are just some poster on a wiki who can't make a point without trying to make his interlocutors look bad to look superior in comparision.

You are this poster.

Third: Did I insult you in anyway? All that I can see is me saying "a God damn chalk","Bloody runes" and "dude". I never insulted you in person in anyway. You imitated my style of posting for mockery, you answered condescendingly, and you used an pointlessly agressive reply. Yeah, it is insulting.

Fourth: What kind of replies was that in the first place ? You only said one, two, three, Three words at the most. I admit those were probably ill-suited: again, your post made it seem as if you were saying those characters didn't use anything to have the power they have, so I made my replies as if to counter those claims, which would have been obvious if it had been your point, but since it wasn't, it just ended up being confusing.

Still no reason to excuse yourself though.

Fifth: You really took your time reading the LN ,right? In case you haven't noticed, Marian is a dwarf. she ,because of her heritage, can use her tools to make weapons of the Gods otherwise the tools become useless if they end up in other hands. Marian can't construct anything without her tools, her tools are useless in anyone's else hands other than Marian's. Quite the conundrum, isn't it? One can't go without the other. I would say both are pretty much inseparable from each other.

Sixth: I replied with a lot of "dude" so you can understand how annoying it is. Oh really? So when an African American talks in ebonics and say something to that effect: '''When there's some shit to be won, Goddamnit, I want it. I don't give a fuck what it is, nigga. You know what I'm talkin' about? I take no prisoners. I go hard doing this shit, nigga. Big dog. Big nuts. When names is on a motherfucking board, I wanna see my name at the top of that motherfucker and next to it, it needs to say 'Winner'.'''

Do you imitate their style of speech to mock them too because it 'annoys' you?

Or if a Jamaican tells you Y'know what, rudeboy... come mek a go deal wit' dem boy dere right now., do you also mock how he speaks?

Do you also mock a Canadian saying 'aboot' or 'eh?' too?

No? No, you don't, at least not to their faces, because in polite society, you don't mock someone's speech unless you want to get your teeth punched in. So why do it online, because of the anonimity and the distance? That only demonstrate that you are not only rude, but a coward. Not a good impression to make.

My habit of interjecting 'dude' annoys you? Tough luck, get used to it, you're the only person I have ever seen complaining about it. As long as people understand the points being made and the message conveyed, anything is fine. Or should I have imitated your poor grammar and syntaxes because it 'annoyed me'? Guess I'm actually more mature than you in that regard (especially eggregious considering I used 'dude' one time in my whole comment, and you clung to it).