Talk:Kamijou Touma/Abilities and Powers/@comment-3969505-20140830211054/@comment-5230978-20140902144321

AND in the end it is only my small theory because IT/dragon was only a bigger IB until now,

It's stated that IT and iB are two different powers. IT split Fiamma's attack in two and the dragons devoured the dark sphere and these are totally different actions from negating an attack. If IT and/or the dragons were a stronger IB then they would have negated those attacks even better and more neatly than IB but they didn't even negate them. And the IT attacked Othinus so it must have means to cause a certain sort of damage, whether it is physical, or mental, or spiritual, differently from IB.

it never harmed anything non-supernatural (even in Vol.2 styil stated that izzard was unharmed, except for the memory loss which happens because IT destroyed the core/medium of ars magna (the memory))

You say the dragon didn't harm anyone and you use Aureolus as reference but it couldn't be more wrong. The core of Ars Magna is not the memory, but the thought as Ars Magna manifests what Aureolus thinks. But more importantly, both memory and thought aren't supernatural phenomena, so a power which only affects supernatural power like IB or, as you believe, IT/dragons wouldn't be able to destroy something natural. Auroelus losing his memory because of the dragon, which is not confirmed to be IT, means that it can cause damages even if not physical.

and this was the reason why your argument isnt stable, they stated that IB travels

Dude, and what make you "theory" stable? Nothing. You didn't give anything to support it, just some wrong oints in you last post, and even the novel gives anything to support it. Of course you can say IB could be IT byproduct just because it could be, but with this logic then we can even say IT could be an ethereal alien, or a god of a parallel universe, or other random stuff only bacuse we don't know so everything could be. That would be nothing but a fantasy, not a theory. You say my argument isn't stable but you didn't even give correct arguments or reference from the novel to make you hypotesis reasonable. How about taking more in cosideration the informations given by the series and to at least partially base your points on them before valuing your own fantasies above those?

''Btw, wasnt there a theory: IT/dragon = Luzifer/fallen angel?'

I was talking only about IT as it is not explainable by Chritianity. For the dragons I remember someone comparing them to the Beast, but with all the mystery behind IB and the powers behind that it's improbable the author will use somehting so simplistic and clichéd.