Talk:Othinus/@comment-115.132.1.106-20140801094553

The way she destroys in such a roundabout and redundant way bothers me.

Sure she can't directly destroy things, but she just needs to create something as a catalyst to achieve the desired result(destruction). There's no need to create anything else during or after.

For example: If she creates an explosion, the explosion will create it's own 'rubble' in the end. There's no need for her to follow up with the creation of the 'rubble'. Or she can just create a hydrogen bomb that's set to explode. There's no need for her to do anything else anymore then.

tl;dr: Se can just create something that can just destroy for her. This effectively makes the sentence 'she can only create' rather improper.