Talk:Aureolus Izzard/@comment-202.152.86.241-20140318132945/@comment-11571396-20140404210109

Yeah, no.

You will notice that here, it is Stiyl who talks, keeping in mind that he is only speculating as he has never seen Ars Magna. That's how ToAru works: unless the narration in Third Person Omniscient affirms it, everything a character says that they have flimsy knowledge about is considered, at best, speculations. Like how Tsuchimikado thought Aleister's plan consisted in creating an Artificial Heaven when it is obviously more complex than that, or how Ollerus likening IB to a 'reference point' is his own interpretation, like how Birdway called Kretune an Adam Kadmon, etc.

Aureolus Izzard is the only magician in history to successfully cast Ars Magna. He knows what Ars Magna actually can do, Like how when the narration is from his poit-of-view:

'Ars Magna turned a person’s wishes into reality. But, once Aureolus believed that he could not win, could not defeat someone, those also became reality, becoming a double-edged sword. It was the reason why he could not create vampires and needed Deep Blood for his goals. The doubts in his heart that he “could not create this” were why he could not form them in reality.'

'Each and every order was like a bullet. If he were to simply think, numerous random thoughts would have mixed in. Thus, the ambiguousness of the order would have prevented its occurrence.'

That's the narration. Nowhere is it said that the ability is in its incomplete form or something. That's your own speculation.

Styil is later proven half right in that Aureolus could defeat him, because he had knowledge fof his powers. And why he lost against Touma, because he didn't. Stating that Ars Magna is somehow 'incomplete' is falsehood, because the guy who achieved it showed us its effects and how it works. Trying to label his power as 'incomplete' based on the what someone who only heard of it and never saw it is being cognitive dissonant. Furthermore, taking Stiyl's 'celestial beings would bow' which sounds like an hyperbole at face value is stupid.

explain me how many times i need to post this and you will still refuse the facts??

You said this as if you once did it. You never did.