Talk:Accelerator/@comment-184.91.216.71-20131114234843/@comment-5230978-20131117215933

After WW3 the meaning of  'chasing' is probably that Accel still see Touma as a model and even if he became a more decent person than before he'd be like Kamijou even more, but in NT 6, after Mugino's reprimand, he understood that it's meaningless and, though he will not be able to do what Touma can, he would be able to do something Touma can't.

I'm not saying that Trident's member died only because attacked, but if you considered that he was willing to kill a man  that tried to murder Leivinia (is identity was irrilevant because he didn't know it in that moment), it's reasonable to think he would kill other guys that could hurt innocent bystanders. Accel doesn't have any affection for Leivinia, not more than a very recent acquaintace of him, so for him she should have more or less the same weight of a bystander in his heart (it's unlikely he developed a sort of fellowship toward her in a so short amount of time, and even if he did it's unlikley it would be strong). Though she is a monster of power, she fundamentally is a good person (though a bit vicous an manipulative), so I think he would react in the same way if she or a bystander get attacked or killed. Why shouldn't he show mercy for the an armed man who he tought had killed something that is almost a stranger for him, but should it for a mercenary group that is willing to involve civilians? And consider how powerful a simple attack of Accel can be. A kick or a punch by him can kill even more than a man at once. At least the first Trident attacked at Napali Coast received damages that would kill any normal human. Maybe Accel didn't killed all of 'em, but it's not farfetched that to assume he killed some.

Well, for both this reason and the one I listed, disloacting arms as mininum measure is very anti-hero-like.