Talk:Number Six/@comment-24.189.134.65-20150126155307/@comment-5230978-20150205113156

''Rensa being destroyed doesn't mean much. The thing is that they can create such technology.''

It still const too much to mass produce her. That's why there is only one. And just like Kihara Enshuu, Rensa operators can't use the Level 5's ability efficiently like the orginal, not all of them at least.

I wasn't really talking about the near future, but technological advancements making the level 5s less important and even obsolete is inevitable in the future.

Who cares about the future. Did your realized the series in the series only 5 months have passed since the beginning of the story? With the pace the story has, do you really think FOs based only on technology, not like the Modelcase Mental Out, surpassing the Level 5s will be seen in the story's present?

For now, and if there is something Kamachi might actually show for us in the future it would be that, instead of a shady level 5 he always treats like an unimportant note.

Why? You are not being very logical about the #6 appearance only saying it could be a joke with no real basis and because it wouldn't be useful to AC in the future. To see Takitsubo as a Level 5 we have to wait a bitas she is still growing, but #6 could be showed in any moment. Kamachi also refers to the saints a lot, but it deosn't mean that he will never show the rest of them.

''I'm talking about importance in their world. With every LN their importance is slowly diminishing in AC. And when Takitsubo gains full control of her power the importance of the current seven level 5s will be over, excepting maybe Accelerator because of his potential as level 6 and Gunha because of his special nature.''

So what? What is important is the story and the role characters, and so even the Level 5s, play in it. Being less useful to AC in the future, not now as they still rely on Level 5s and study them, is not a reason to not show the #6. Weak point.

''Maybe, but it doesn't proof anything. It is just implying it, not affirming.''

And was yours a statement. Just another implication, and weak one as you used a character that only ses certain type of attacks to say the #6 is the weakest.

''Could be, but only could. Another implication.''

Again, your wasn't really better.

''Implication: the conclusion that can be drawn from something, although it is not explicitly stated. You are saying it implies one thing, I'm saying it implies another thing. You created an explanation that goes against my own, but that explanation isn't a fact itself. It doesn't serve to refute what I believe it is implying.''

It is as you used the "power" excuse as base to your example, but power has nothing to do with Rensa 28, otherwise she would alwasy use Accel's power, which is also the most reasonable choice for her style.

''Wasting so much time? He is hardly wasting time with the Number Six. Just read this wiki page. You can count on your fingers the times the Number Six appeared or was mentioned. Also, you must be aware Kamachi isn't beneath making jokes, and bringing them up again in another stories. Having some jokes there is to be expected.''

I mean that he started referring to the # 6 times ago and still does. Kamachi repeat some jokes but they aren't arelated on identity of a character or something thta could have plot utility. They are just normal jokes direct to the characters, no to the readers.

''We cannot really even talk about this, because the series isn't over so we don't know what he might address and what he might never address. I can say that right now there are things he never addressed, even things from the first LNs.''

But there are any reasons to think he changed his way of doing things. Even Misaki was a mysterious characters being referenced since the ery irst volume, but she appeared in the end. For now #6 is no different. Kamachi uses what he need to use. Do you really think he had to address what wasn't useful in that circumstances? Only because something is yet to be showed doesn't mean it will never be showed.

It sound as ridiculous as a joke, doesn't it?

Which, again, is nothing but an unfounded opinion of yours.