Thread:Kamina lowell/@comment-25379706-20140903013731/@comment-5230978-20140918193641

''high and mighty? what part of my speech was ment to mark me as having such qualities? ''

The whole post was filled with the arrogance of being right when you weren't, not even a bit. If you prefer I will rectify and say "Don't act as if you are right, etc."

you surely are idiots.

And you surely are bad mannered. Can you express your opinion only if you add blatant and undeserved insults? It seems having a decent and more polite discussion with you is impossible and that in the end your statement about trying to have a better interaction was nothign but a lie.

"the inner circle" was ment as the following " if something is not approved them then it will lose credibility and be subjected to severe mockery from fellow members of the wikia as they are key members"

I know what you mean with "inner circle" and I said nothing that sounds as if I didn't. What you described as inner circle is just your distorted view of our behaviour, which doesn't absolutely represent reality. Even newer members strongly disagreed with you and even to what other members, new and old, so you can't really say that only the older or the key members disagree with you. And I'm not even a  key member. Most of my edits are just minor ones, so I never thought that I was an important cog of the wheel, which will perfectly work even without me. Again, there is no inner circle in this wiki as much as there isn't any plot against you.

''and please tell me. what is the meaning of opinion? if I can't state what I think and what I think is relative to the subject at hand then what can I possibly do ?''

I never said you can't say what you think, but if you write what are commonly known as nonsense, biased opinions, and rants with zero objectivity you can't really say that the others are wrong and you are right. If you want to continue this way, you can do it, no one can stopping you (administrators excluded), but don't be surprised if you receive certain reactions and replies when you say certain things and in certain ways.

''then who marks what's a flaw and what's not one? you? herald of meridian? king? OH&S? or any other user that I forgot to mention? if I'm not the one marking them, does that mean that you do ? aren't you acting "high and mighty" then? my whole argument is based around the concept of "invailding the argument of my adversary" when I can't make you back off with my words, I would withdraw .''

You really like to misinterpret what others say and distort it in the most negative way, eh? Seriosusly, do you really not know what makes an objective flaw? We are not talking about persons, but about a work of fictions, divided in this case in novel, manga, anime and games which always follow certain rules. Even just with a decent analytical skill and knowledge about literature/television series(animated or not)/comics/games/etc. someone can normally comprehend if a work is objectively well made or not (I'm talking about pure objectivity, and not personal tastes). Some examples of general objective flaws in fictional works can be contraddictive explanations, or meaningless abuse of certain tropes (essentially total lack of ideas and originality), or confused explanation or total lack of it (and I'm not talking about exaplantions that will be given or will become more clear later). There are a lot of objectively good films, books, series which I don't like for different reasons, but this doesn't mean that if I see elements of them as flaws they become objective flaws. It's just what one sees as a flaw. And between the others things that make a flaw objective there are the ones said by Ds, which should be more than obvious.