Talk:Accelerator/@comment-184.91.216.71-20131114234843/@comment-5230978-20131116165646

1 - He didn't killed Worst because she is a Sisters and temporary recevored himself from his mental breakdown.

2 - He didn't killed Sugitani, but you are conveniently forgetting that he butchered Depart and Spark Signal in the same volume. Probably he spared Sugitani because he thought that, like him, he really wanted to be a good person but his mentality was twisted by the dark side and ended up using wrong methods to save people, so he let him alive because he saw in him the potential for becoming a more decent person. For example, in Kakine's case he didn't see this and he had no problem to kill him, though at the end he didn't die, because letting him alive would have been dangerous for others.

3 - If he had killed all the soldier he wouldn't have obtained any information. He used the best method to obtain information. He clearly changed and he will not physically hurt or kill when it can be avoided, but it doesn't mean he will not to it at all. I already listed some clear examples of this in the previous post.

4 - True, a parent would normally act like that, but he changed his mind from "hurt" to "kill" in a so short time that it's a bit frightening. Even Hamazura killed to protect his loved ones and clearly he isn't a hero but an anti-hero.

5 - Weak point. You said that Accel stopped killing enemies and he wasn't willing to do kill anymore, but now you say that killing for protect his loved ones and to save his life it's ok. I don't remember about Touma be willing to kill someone only to protect himself. Accel wanted to kill Kakine even before being in danger. And between Accel and Kakine there is a natural enmity that his not explainable by the first almost killing the second and the second almost killing Yomikawa. More importanyly, when Accel "killed" Kakine his lifes wasn't in danger anymore, because Kakine was losing control of his body and he wouldn't have been able to kill him anymore, but he "killed" him nonetheless because he could gate back on track in the future.

7 - I don't remeber is it was stated that the Trident's memebr Accel hit simply losing consciousnes, but Accel used reflection and kiccked them away so it safe enough to assume that some of them died, at least the one that creashed agaist a vending machine after a kick of the strongest esper.

8 - He didn't killed the "heroes" because he knew they were controlled or because he wanted to check if it was really necessary to kill them or not.

9 - What are you saying? Accel already saved people without killing, like the worked held in hostage by Saraku. ''And his skill could only be called more than miraculous given the fact that not even one person had died despite the massive amount of destruction. His ability in vector control had already reached that level.'' This extract isn't praising him not killing anyone, but his skill in using vector control that caused such destruction without casualties.

10 - Touma wasn't willing to kill Yakumi, because he was sure that Resnsa would have saved her. Obviously Touma isn't a perfect hero, but he is not even an anti-hero.

11 - Nope Accel killed him with is final strike. Probably he would

12 - Oh, true, he wasn't sure if it was really the case to kill Umidori. Anyway, in the same volume he attacked Hamazura and it was said that he would have at least dislocated both his arms so that he couldn't fight at all. He knew Hamazura was intende to save Fremea so he likely did it to prevent him getting in the way or even to avoid him be killed by Freshmen, but whatever the reason is this is not a method a hero would use.

Again, Accel really changed a lot duirng WW3, but he's still an anti-hero. Remember that there are a lot of levels of anti-heroicalness. He isn't the psychopathic anti-hero that he was before vol 20, he is a more merciful one, but still an anti-hero. He also stopped trying to become a hero like Touma in NT 6.