OH&S (Message Wall | contribs) (Created page with "I've updated Template:Shared Draft 80 with the results of my AWB search in the Description Absence Check. '''2,455''' files had completely empty descriptions. Interesting...") |
OH&S (Message Wall | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Interesting findings: |
Interesting findings: |
||
| − | *If the <nowiki>{{TrackTag#}}</nowiki> is kept in a HTML comment, it won't be picked up the WLH as it technically isn't transcluded |
+ | *If the <nowiki>{{TrackTag#}}</nowiki> is kept in a HTML comment, it won't be picked up the WLH as it technically isn't transcluded. |
*You can quickly generate a full list of articles/files/pages where <nowiki>{{TrackTag#}}</nowiki> is trancluded using AWB: |
*You can quickly generate a full list of articles/files/pages where <nowiki>{{TrackTag#}}</nowiki> is trancluded using AWB: |
||
*#Make List |
*#Make List |
||
Revision as of 11:55, 19 March 2020
I've updated Template:Shared Draft 80 with the results of my AWB search in the Description Absence Check. 2,455 files had completely empty descriptions.
Interesting findings:
- If the {{TrackTag#}} is kept in a HTML comment, it won't be picked up the WLH as it technically isn't transcluded.
- You can quickly generate a full list of articles/files/pages where {{TrackTag#}} is trancluded using AWB:
- Make List
- Source: What transcludes page (all NS)
- What embeds: Template:TrackTag#
- Make List
I'm now going to run the bot to remove Template:Track Tag from the files.